No one loves Snape like Snape loved Lily…

Because Snape wasn’t in love with Lily. He was obsessed, and that’s a really big difference from being in love with a person.

But anyway, this is a character analysis (aka meta post) about Severus Snape, because I felt like you guys (that’s the readers, obviously) needed a break from the complete radio silence and recently-blogged sexuality angstpost. Also, I told my English teacher that I was going to write a post and actually put it online this week. (Hi, Mrs. N!)

So, getting back to the point: Severus Snape.

Look at the bitchface on this man, like damn son I would kill to be able to pull off a bitchface like that man can.

I’ve got a little thing to confess: I love Severus Snape. I love his snark, I love his sarcasm, and I think he’s a pretty terrifyingly badass character.

I also think he’s an abusive, petty, neglectful bastard who can’t teach for shit. (Yes, I can recognize flaws in my favorite characters)

1. Severus Snape was a bad teacher.

There is no doubt about it: Severus Snape was a bad Potions professor and an even worse Headmaster. I’ve got some stuff to say about his position as Headmaster, but let’s talk about his Potions position first, shall we?

Harry Potter

See this adorable little nerd right here? Snape wants to crush him under his boot like a worm.

When Harry Potter walked into Hogwarts, Snape made it his mission to abuse, mistreat, neglect, and otherwise harm him. This is evidenced by Snape’s actions during Harry’s first Potions lesson, when he called on an unprepared, uneducated student who had only known about magic for a few months before his arrival at Hogwarts. Obviously, to fire questions at one’s students on the first day, when it is perfectly logical and reasonable to assume that at least a few of those same students have never brewed potions before, is a bad way to teach.

Snape went above and beyond this. He asked Harry, specifically, “What would I get if I added powdered root of asphodel to an infusion of wormwood?” Snape then continued to pepper Harry with questions, taking points off when Harry didn’t know them. Admittedly, I do see the point in wanting to know if your students had actually cracked open their schoolbooks during the summer, but Snape directed his questions only at Harry, and scorned Hermione when she tried to answer them. We see Snape from Harry’s biased point-of-view, so our perspectives of the Potions professor are somewhat tainted, but anyone who had observed that first scene would have realized that what Snape did was, at the very least, slightly unethical.

An addendum to this scene: Some fans have theorized that Snape meant something when he asked Harry about asphodel and wormwood. Apparently, in the Victorian language of flowers, asphodel is a type of lily meaning ‘my regrets follow you to the grave,’ and wormwood means ‘absence’ and symbolizes bitter sorrow. When you apply these meanings to the question Snape asks, its meaning changes to something along the lines of “Lily’s death is bitterly regretted.” Honestly, I think this is just J.K.’s mastery at work again, and isn’t supposed to be an intentional message from Snape to Harry. Besides, does Snape really expect Harry, an 11-year-old, to know the Victorian language of flowers? A pureblood first year might know the meaning of Snape’s question, but seeing as Malfoy was in Harry’s class and didn’t show any signs of having realized what Snape was allegedly trying to say, it’s pretty doubtful.

Snape continues to torment Harry throughout his years at Hogwarts, blaming him for others’ innocent mistakes–one notable incident occurred when Neville messed up his potion and Snape told Harry off for ‘not stopping Neville from doing the wrong thing.’ In his judgements, Snape is clearly biased against the houses Gryffindor, Ravenclaw, and Hufflepuff, but has a vendetta for the Golden Trio in particular. Several incidences of Malfoy, Crabbe, and Goyle tossing things into Harry’s potion in the middle of class, and Snape rounding on Harry for messing up, have occurred throughout the series. Obviously, Snape chooses to let the Slytherins have free reign in his classroom, and tries to thoroughly and completely squash anyone else who tries to achieve greatness under his foot.

Hermione Granger

This little girl? Snape hates her too.

This is further demonstrated in GoF, when Snape happens upon the Trio and Malfoy’s troupe of Slytherins fighting in the hall. As far as I can remember (I don’t have a copy of the 4th book on hand right now), Malfoy (?) hexes Hermione with Densaugeo, making her two front teeth (which she happens to be very self-conscious about) grow incredibly large. I think she was described as looking like a beaver in the book. Anyway, Snape looks around. He sees the evidence of a fight, and his eyes land on Hermione, who, at this point in time, is almost sobbing. Or at least I think so. But anyway, he says, “I see no difference” in Hermione’s appearance, and this sends Hermione into tears, and she flees the scene.

Additionally, Snape berates and humiliates Hermione countless times throughout the series; when she tries to help Neville, he tells her to stop; when she tries to answer a question, he calls her a know-it-all; he refers to her as the ‘Gryffindor know-it-all’, part of the Trio.

Some people have claimed that Snape hates and insults Hermione so much because she reminds him of another really smart, skilled female Gryffindor Muggleborn: Lily Evans.

What do I think? I think this is a bunch of crap. Yes, there are many surface similarities between Hermione and Lily, but wouldn’t Snape have tried to treat Hermione nicely, if he was supposed to have regretted Lily’s death so much? I don’t know about you, readers, but if I were reminded of a dead love by this precocious little kid, I wouldn’t treat them like shit. But anyway, let’s go on to Neville.

Neville Longbottom

And this innocent kid? Snape ruined his self-esteem.


Boy, have I got a lot to say about Neville and Snape.

From the very beginning of his 7 years at Hogwarts, Neville was constantly undermined, beaten down, and mentally and emotionally abused by Snape. Yes, abused. It is abuse if one of the people you can trust to take care of you insults your every attempt to learn, you know. Snape constantly talked down to Neville, told him he was nothing, and yelled at him every time he messed up, while making no attempt to correct Neville’s mistakes and teach him the correct methods of brewing.

Also, I want to talk a bit about a small moment in the 3rd book, PoA.

When Remus Lupin, the Defense teacher in 1993, brought in a real live Boggart for his third-years to face, Neville’s worst fear was Severus Snape. His worst fear wasn’t his parents lying dead on the floor, or Voldemort reborn, come to kill them all, or even a small phobia. It was his goddamn Potions professor. A teacher is someone you can trust, and at Hogwarts especially so. They do board there for 10 months out of the year, of course. But even if you can’t exactly trust your professor, you’d probably know them well enough that you wouldn’t really fear them. Except when you hadn’t done your homework.

But Neville? Neville was scared. He was scared of one of the only authority figures in his school life, because in his three years at Hogwarts, Snape had done nothing for Neville but insult him, laugh at his attempts at brewing, and completely undermine Neville’s enthusiasm and self-esteem. And to make things worse, Snape probably knew it. No, he definitely did. In canon, Snape treated Neville considerably worse after the Boggart lesson, because he had heard that Lupin had coached Neville to imagine Snape in Augusta Longbottom’s clothing. Like I said, abuse.

Snape really fucked up Neville’s education, in summary. And watching the frustration and hate grow in a young boy for a valuable subject and skill, to the point where he would shudder when talking about Potions or Snape, is just so sad. Because, as we saw in DH, Neville is a hero, in his own way. He helped kill Voldemort, stood up to the whole of the Death Eater army and the Dark Lord, and organized children into a veritable army. And this makes me wonder; if Snape had been a real, caring, good teacher, what would Neville have managed to accomplish in his Potions class? Would he potentially have gone on to invent the Wizarding World’s equivalent to a cancer cure? Maybe a better version of the Wolfsbane potion?

I have no idea. And that makes me sad. Because, if Neville, the boy ridiculed by pretty much everyone in his own house, was able to do such great things, how many other students has Snape’s negligence and shitty-as-hell teaching skills ruined?


Let’s sit back and summarize for a second, just to review what we’ve seen of Snape.

  • He undermined and ruined many students’ potentials
  • He neglected his teaching
  • He outright abused many of his students


Keeping all that in mind, let’s proceed to the topic of:

2. Lily Potter

(damn, this is a long post. 1540 words written already, and I still haven’t reached the Marauders yet)

Snape and Lily’s friendship is a very…complicated thing. The two were friends from their pre-Hogwarts years to right after the 5th-year OWLS. Then, Snape did the unthinkable: he called Lily a Mudblood.

In the HP canon, as J.K. has structured it, to call someone a Mudblood is, in a pinch, really fucking terrible. I’d wager it’s worse than calling someone the n-word, especially since that word has been removed of most of its shock value with pop culture. White boys, y’know? They just never stop calling each other f****ts and n****rs. (“Woo, yeah, let’s go make light of minorities’ struggles by calling each other derogatory insults!” seems to be the mentality I’ve seen.)

So, keeping in mind the sheer horror and intensity of the word ‘Mudblood,’ let’s proceed.

Snape and Lily, at the point in time before the Incident, were great friends. Though Lily disapproved of Snape’s associates in Slytherin, and Snape, in turn, disapproved of James Potter’s constant flirting with Lily, they were still the closest things to best friends they would ever be, up until the Incident.

The Incident itself is a pretty horrifying thing. Imagine that you’ve had a friend for, oh, about 6-8 years now. You share several very important secrets (the magic thing, for one) and you’re pretty much always seen together, even though everyone in your school disapproves of your friendship. You think you’re probably going to stay friends forever, and you plan to stay that way. Then, your best friend in the world calls you the most demeaning, insulting thing ever known to man (or wizard, in this case). Obviously, you’re going to feel betrayed, destroyed, like your friendship is now worthless. You probably never want to talk to your former friend again. Thing is, he keeps trying to talk to you.

That was probably Lily Evans’ reaction to the Incident. It’s entirely reasonable that she would act aloof, cold, and even rude to her former best friend after these events, no? Then why is it that people insist that Snape should have married Lily, and that Lily should have, in the words of a certain Tumblr user, “just sucked it up and forgiven him”?

Honestly, Snape merely fancied himself in love with Lily. He wasn’t in love with Lily, he was in love with the idea of her. He stalked her to the point of obsession, obsession so severe that his Patronus mirrored hers exactly.


That’s not love. Having your Patronuses match doesn’t show love, it shows obsession. What James Potter had with Lily is a different matter. James’ Patronus was a stag. Lily’s, a doe. They were a pair, the two of them. Snape’s Patronus matched Lily’s, not because he loved her so much, but because he was obsessed.

Besides, if the real Lily Potter, not the construct Snape had built in his own mind, were alive, and if Snape were to tell her of his affections, I bet she would bitchslap him so hard there wouldn’t be anything left of him for James.


A man abuses your child for six years, plots to sacrifice the lives of your husband and child so that you can live, helped in the alienation of your elder sister, completely hated your husband and his friends, exposes your friend’s ‘furry little secret’ to the world, and then tells you he’s in love with you?

Because, of course it’s completely in character for Lily to say “OMG, I want a love story in which my best friend calls me a racial slur and then proceeds to join a terrorist group based on killing people of my heritage and then accidentally endangers me and tries to bargain the lives of my child and the man I love away in exchange for me like some creepy bartering system and in causing my death decides to protect my son out of guilt but really spends his entire childhood being an asshole to him – OH WAIT”

Basically, telling people you think Snape’s actions in the first six books and most of the last book are completely justified by his betrayal of Voldemort and ‘love’ for Lily is the cue for me to whip out my 2k+ metapost and slap you with it.

Also, telling people you “love them like Snape loved Lily” isn’t really a good thing.


And that’s the end of my hella long spiel on Snape. For now.

I mean, I really appreciate his snarkiness, but he doesn’t make for a character that symbolizes ‘good’ nearly as much as people think he does.

That said, I think Severus Snape is motherfucking fabulous.

And with that said, I think I’ll end the post here. This monster’s almost 2,400 words long, so…

Don’t worry, I’ll be back. I’m working on a Who fic I think some of you guys’ll like. A lot. So keep your eyes open, I guess, and check back at this blog for more soon!

About Danny

I blog about whatever's on my mind. Usually that's stuff like Harry Potter metaposts, writing, and LGBTQ+ topics.
This entry was posted in Blogging, Books, Fandom-related, fangirl stuff, Harry Potter, Potterstuff, Theories and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to No one loves Snape like Snape loved Lily…

  1. River says:

    Wow, 2k+ and you still haven’t discussed the Marauders yet. XD You must do a post on it sometime, I demand it.

    Your words ring truth, though I’ll say one thing: I think that Snape did redeem himself in the end. Does that mean I think he should have married Lily? Not a chance. Do I think his actions were completely justified? Nope, not that either. His actions were just more understandable: He made his choices and had to live with them, and that made him really bitter. And he was playing the double agent as well, which helps explain a lot too.

    Also, on the love theme: It seems like a lot of stories these days are romanticizing obsessive love. Maybe that has something to do with people’s reactions?

    [Well, this reply was supposed to be where I debate some point or other, but I think I just ended up vehemently agreeing with you. Funny how that happens sometimes. . . :)]

    • I was planning to do a follow-up to this just focusing on the Marauders and Snape. You can tell I’ve done a lot of thinking on this subject, haven’t you? (if you think this is a lot of thinking, never ask to see my analysis of Narnia and Susan’s treatment in particular)

      I’m not saying that I didn’t think Snape wasn’t redeemed in the end, I’m just saying that because he did redeem himself doesn’t mean it’s OK to just sweep his past doings under the carpet. Some people seem to think that just because he was secretly a double-agent, he could have treated Harry however he wanted and it was justified because “he worked for Dumbledore!”
      Yes, his actions were more understandable, but that didn’t mean he had the right to completely mess up the educations of almost every single student who studied under him. *cough* Neville *cough*

      Romanticizing obsessive love? Have you seen Twilight? *shudders*
      Actually, I think it’s something ingrained into society. You see, when a typical straight couple breaks up and the boy peppers the girl with texts and phone calls afterwards, society as a whole encourages that girl to ‘forgive him and get back together.’ But if the girl is the one incessantly calling the boy, she is labeled as ‘clingy’, ‘creepy’, and ‘too attached’.
      I have more on this subject, it’s just hard to actually put down on paper…or type onto computer…you know what I mean.

      • River says:

        Oh no, I couldn’t tell at all. Everyone just bashes out 2k+ words whenever they think of something in passing. . . XD I’m glad that you’re writing more, so keep ’em coming! Will you be more active over the summer, or will you have classes?

        Well, you’ll note that I did end up agreeing with you by the end of my comment. Yeah, his actions weren’t justified, and I’m surprised he was able to keep teaching, Potions/DAD genius or not. Oh wait, no I’m not, they allow teachers who verbally abuse students to stay in the school systems all the time. . . but that’s another can of worms that we won’t open right now. Maybe I should say that I’m surprised Dumbledore let him keep teaching, but I’m pretty certain that was explained at some point too (though I can’t remember when. I should probably reread the books soon.).

        Yeah, that’s one of the most-publicized ones. There’s others I’ve read recently too. And it always seems that the hero is a bad-boy character, which irritates me a bit.

        That’s a good point. It’s unhealthy both ways, as it conditions girls to just forgive him (if there was a good reason they broke up, I mean) and the boys to believe they can do whatever and still be forgiven. (Of course these are very broad terms/situations, but still. The principle holds I think.)

        Yeah, I know what you mean. Maybe it’d be easier to talk about instead of type about?

  2. Jeyna Grace says:

    I have to agree, Snape was not a good teacher. He shouldn’t be a teacher in the first place… makes me wonder why Dumbledore let him be one. I like Snape though, but I won’t be bias on this.

  3. selkie1964 says:

    Here’s the thing… I see a lot of people commenting on various characters as if they were real, living people (how would Neville have turned out if Snape hadn’t abused him, etc.) Neville couldn’t have turned out any different, nor could Snape or anyone in any book ever, because that’s the way they were written. The author (in this case, J.K. Rowling) wrote each character in a particular way for a certain effect, and to fulfill a certain role and purpose in the story she was telling. It’s completely useless and pointless to speculate on how differently things might have been if only… because that is not the way the author wrote the story. Hermione couldn’t have been black; no-one besides Dumbledore could have been gay; Snape couldn’t have been nicer to Harry or Hermione or Neville; Neville couldn’t have grown up less downtrodden; Snape could never have married Lily… because that wasn’t J.K. Rowling’s story.

    It’s like, when I was in a creative writing class and we were reading Hemingway’s “Hills Like White Elephants”—the woman in that story is a class-A whiny pathetic nasty bitch. We were having a discussion in class about this, and about the awful way the man in the story treated her (because of how she acted, presumably). Someone said “well, she *was* a total bitch!” And the teacher said “Yes, because that’s the way Hemingway wrote her.” It was like this huge eye-opening moment…characters in literature *can’t* be different in any way from the way they were written because they have no existence except within the framework set by the author in order to tell a particular story. Change any of the characters, and you will change the story out of all recognition.

Enter your comment here.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s